Practice guide
Finding the Requirements for a Product
A disciplined route from product identity and intended use to a documented federal requirement register.
Read the guideFederal regulation
FSIS HACCP requirements connect a process-specific hazard analysis with critical controls, validation, verification and records. Official establishments assess the hazards associated with their products and operations rather than adopting a model unchanged. The system relies on both scientific support and evidence that the controls work in the establishment. Sanitation and other prerequisite programs support, but do not replace, the hazard-analysis decision.
Part 417 requires a hazard analysis to determine food-safety hazards reasonably likely to occur and the preventive measures the establishment can apply. Product descriptions, intended use and process flow establish the context. Grouping products together requires a reasoned relationship between their processes and hazards, not merely a shared commercial category or packaging format. HACCP regulation.
A HACCP plan addresses identified hazards through critical control points and critical limits, with monitoring, corrective actions, verification and records. The plan should describe the actual operation and its controls. FSIS’s preparation guidebook illustrates methods and forms but expressly does not create new requirements or mandate those particular forms. FSIS plan guidebook.
FSIS’s validation guidance explains the relationship between scientific or technical support and in-plant evidence demonstrating implementation. A published study must be relevant to the product and operating conditions. Establishment observations show whether the supported parameters can actually be achieved. Possessing a research paper without matching the process does not validate a materially different production operation. Validation guideline.
Monitoring observes the critical controls in operation; verification assesses whether the system is being implemented as intended. Reassessment evaluates continuing adequacy, including when changes affect the hazard analysis or plan. These activities have distinct purposes and record implications. A final product result alone does not demonstrate that each critical limit was met during production. Part 417.
The system retains the hazard analysis, supporting documentation, plan and implementation records required by the regulation. Evidence supporting a prerequisite program may also be important to a decision that a hazard is not reasonably likely to occur. Records should make the establishment’s reasoning and actual control visible, rather than simply reproduce a generic model. FSIS preparation guidebook.
Describe the product and flow, identify hazards, select controls and verify that supporting studies match the operating parameters. Assemble implementation evidence and review deviations for their effect on system adequacy. Use the validation guideline alongside the regulation; FSIS guidance provides interpretive assistance and is not an approval of a particular commercial HACCP plan. FSIS validation resource.
Sources checked 2026-10-19. This is the review date for this profile, separate from any legal effective or compliance date.
codified regulation
9 CFR Part 417www.ecfr.gov
nonbinding guidebook
Guidebook for the Preparation of HACCP Planswww.fsis.usda.gov
nonbinding validation guidance
HACCP Systems Validation Guidelinewww.fsis.usda.gov
Practice guide
A disciplined route from product identity and intended use to a documented federal requirement register.
Read the guidePractice guide
A practical examination of identity, method, scope, results and the meaning of a conformity claim.
Read the guide